Thursday 9 February 2017

Paul's close relationship with his mother has provoked many Freudian and Oedipal readings of the novel. Discuss the validity if this kind of reading

OEDIPUS COMPLEX IN SONS AND LOVERS

‘Sons and Lovers’ by D.H Lawrence is read as a modernist novel to which Oedipus complex can be applied. This psychoanalytic theory is visible at many levels in the novel; in relation to Mrs. Morel and her sons, Miriam and Clara as mother substitute and Baxter as a father substitute. The answer focuses mainly on the relationship between Paul Morel, the protagonist and his mother.
Oedipus complex is a term coined by psychologist Sigmund Freud in the book ‘Interpretation of Dreams (1899)’. Oedipus was the protagonist of the book “Oedipus Tyrannus” written by Sophocles in 429 BC. King Oedipus driven out of his native land because of prophesy that he will kill his father and marry his mother grows up and unconsciously kills his father and marries the woman who is his mother. In psychoanalytic theory, Oedipus complex refers to the child’s desire for sexual involvement with the opposite sex parents particularly a boy’s erotic attention to his mother. This complex played an important role in psychosexual development. It also leads to a matured sexual identity. According to critics D.H Lawrence’s novel ‘Sons and Lovers’ is an evidence of Oedipus complex but is the mother- son love really oedipal and not out of pure biological love between parent and child.
Freud thinks that the boy child develops feeling of hatred towards father and love towards mother from childhood. The boy then for having taken mother as his own possession regards father as enemy wanting to take his place. Thus this complex is also called ‘Mother Fixation’. Mrs. Morel because of her failed marriage paid all attention to her sons especially Paul since William died at a young age and Paul had an illness. lI Haiyan says ‘because of the strong abnormal maternal love from his mother, Paul has Oedipus complex and so Paul’s life becomes a tragedy’. Is Paul’s relationship with Mr. Morel really oedipal? Does William also have Oedipus complex or does only the mother love the children not the other way around.
If there is Oedipus complex then the root cause of it would be the failed marriage of Mrs. Morel and her love towards her sons. Why does the child hate the father? Because the father establishes prohibition against incest, the mother is deprived of child and child suffers from imaginary castration and since father has the phallus he becomes the rival. Child’s personality is marked by Oedipus complex. According to Lacan if the dissolution of the complex is to take place the child must identify with the father, love for father can’t be avoided as it will allow the son to assume his own masculinity. Doreen Dewart says that Lawrence selected the name Gertrude because of the mother- son relationship between Hamlet and his Mother Gertrude. In Hamlet father is absent and in Paul’s case, the conventional father figure is absent. Hamlet does not want his mother to go his uncle’s bed and Paul realizes that his mother has not had sexual fulfillment. Mrs. Morel because of her disappointment in Mr. Morel finds a husband/ lover substitute first in William then in Paul. She dedicates her life, energy and love on her children. Through them she wishes to improve the financial and social situation of the family which has become miserable in the coal mining neighborhood. But can’t a mother love her sons and be protective of them? Why the relationship is named Oedipus? Oedipus kills the father and has sexual relationship with mother. Yes William and Paul have a hatred for father; they do not want to tell him anything that happens in family, “He was shut out from family affair” (p.64). His role is limited only to a bread earner. They do wish him to die but none of the sons actually have a sexual relationship with the mother. The love that the mother and sons felt was because of social factors and social environment. The relationship between William and Mrs. Morel is defined in the first chapter. William is proud to be seen with his mother because “no other women looked such a lady as she did” (p.41). William is the substitute husband whom Mrs. Morel can’t find in her marriage and the sons are a source of emotional fulfillment for her. William takes his father’s place in mother’s heart. “Already William was a lover to her”. (p.44). Mrs. Morel disapproved of William’s dancing and girlfriends. Can’t a mother disagree with her child’s decision? Is every mother who disapproves of his son’s girlfriend then in love with her son? Aruna Sitesh says “William dies torn between his lady love and mother”.
The psycho sexual development of Paul began in his early age, he would have no peace if the mother was upset he knew how she felt. While sharing space with mother in bronchitis he says “sleep is most perfect…when it is shared with a beloved” (p.64). Every child likes to sleep with their mother because of the protective, loved and comfortable space provided by the mother. Does it make it Oedipal then, just because he called her beloved? Lawrence uses the words like “love token” (p.65), “beloved” (p.64) to make their relationship sound Oedipal but Paul and Mrs. Morel do not have a relationship like the one Oedipus shared with Jocasta. It could be an overtly loved mother- son relationship but critics label it Oedipus complex. Paul and Miriam’s love blooms but because Paul comes home late he feels guilty and Gertrude on the other hand recognizes Miriam as a threat, a rival for Paul’s affection. She makes her dislike clear when Miriam comes for tea, when they sit in the chapel he becomes happy because he finds it “wonderfully sweet and soothing to sit there for hour and a half next to Miriam and near mother, unifying his two loves under the spell of the place of worship” (p.183). But while coming back Paul and Gertrude blame Miriam for their own reasons. Gertrude does not want Miriam to “absorb him”. When Paul says “no, mother I really don’t love her, I talk to her but I want to come home to you” (p.202). it’s as if a husband is assuring his wife of loving her when she is accusing him of infidelity. Why is Paul feeling guilty? Is it because he does not want to enjoy the pleasure his mother does not get? Why does Gertrude say she never “actually had a husband” to her son? Does she want the pleasure and life of a woman who has a husband like Paul? Like Gertrude choose a wrong husband, she does not want her sons to find a bad match and so she gets anxious when they find a girl and have them met with her. Paul always comes to his mother’s defense like any other son would. Paul is at peace whenever he is with Gertrude, he loved his mother best. Paul tries hard to alleviate family poverty. According to Lacan Paul has become Mother’s phallus meaning he is anxious about Mrs. Morel’s lack of sexual fulfillment. When his father is hospitalized he fancies himself as “the man of the house”. Children get excited when a responsibility is entrusted upon them, it’s casually said, take care of house or mother or sister to boys, does it mean every boy is suffering from Oedipus complex? After his break with Miriam Paul is driven towards Clara Dawnes who was introduced by Miriam to him.
The relationship Paul has with Clara and Miriam are not wholesome like he wants. He tries to find a mother substitute in both the women. But don’t we all try to find a mother substitute? In front of Clara the mother looks older, Clara is luxuriant and appears superior to Mrs. Morel. Paul finds age and vitality in Clara which was missing in Mrs. Morel. Earlier he was with Miriam for artistic and spiritual quality which was also lacking in Mrs. Morel. Clara has all the qualities which lack in mother, maybe Paul is looking for a younger version of his mother but because of Oedipus complex he is unable to stay with her. The mother substitute which he tries to find doesn’t appear to be successful as both lack in some quality. Faith Pulin says Lawrence is a ruthless manipulator of women since he tries to show that its women who lack something or the other and not Paul; his only excuse is the Oedipus complex whose truth value is not even proved completely. Paul according to critics is not able to maintain a steady relationship with any women because of his attachment to this mother. Paul also finds a father substitute in Baxter (Clara’s husband). He finds the missing father figure in Baxter; earlier he hated his father and even wished him to die which is an oedipal element but in Baxter he finds a father figure as well as a friend. Like Lacan said the boy has to love the father to overcome the complex, Lawrence provides Paul with a father figure so in the end he is able to kill his mother and overcome the complex.  Baxter and Mr. Morel use the same dialect and Baxter fights with Paul as many times as Mr. Morel did. At the time Paul give an overdose of morphine to Mrs. Morel Paul says “My love…oh my love” (p.410), the shock of seeing the mother dead is expresses in horror and he keeps on calling her “my love” like a lover would. Can’t a son address his mother as “love” when the mother dies? Of course the son would express more love than he ever has. Even at funeral he kisses her in order to wake her up like a fairytale but unfortunately realism sets in and she doesn’t wake up. Paul is first of all in guilt and secondly a very important part of his life has gone, it’s obvious all his emotions would come up on surface. Ashok Celly says the killing was to free himself from the crippling hold of mother. If he wanted to get free he would have got freed after some time, why would he take on the sin of killing his own mother?  Paul finds incomplete mother substitute in Miriam and Clara and a father substitute in Baxter, the reunion of Mr. and Mrs. Morel. We can say Paul overcame his Oedipus complex when his mother died but did he really have the complex?
Is it Oedipus complex or Jocasta complex? Or both? Paul is shown as curious about mother’s sexual life, wants to be in the same cottage as her, man of house, and quotes her with words used by lovers. On the other hand Mrs. Morel makes the children her emotional support, she is anxious of her son’s girlfriends. She desires her son’s as substitute for her husband says Doreen Dewart. Is it not okay for mother and son to love each other without getting labeled as incestuous or sexual? Why is too much emphasis placed on sexual aspect of a relationship rather than its aesthetic aspect? The only Oedipal aspect of the novel is the son’s hatred towards father and finding a father substitute in Baxter. There is no sexual desire in Paul towards mother and calling loving names is not part of sexual behavior, attachment to one’s mother is natural and not a part of Oedipus complex.

WORKS CITED
Celly, Ashok. Sons and Lovers edited by Ashok Celly. Delhi: worldview publications, an imprint of Book Land Publishing Co., 2015.
Doreen, Dewart. Jacques Lacan’s interpretation of the Oedipus comlex and its application to the family dynamics depicted in D.H Lawrence’s sons and lovers.
L.H.Y., Weng, R.Q., and Guo, X.J (2016). Paul Morel’s Oedipus complex in sons and lovers. Studies in literature and language, 13 (1), 2016.
Salgado, Gamini. A preface to D.H Lawrence. (2000)
Sitesh, Aruna. Women in sons and lovers. Sons and Lovers edited by Ashok Celly. Delhi: worldview publications, an imprint of Book Land Publishing Co., 2015.


Deepali Yadav
Please like, comment and share. Your valuable suggestions are always welcome. Happy readingJ

No comments:

Post a Comment